Maria Luisa Falorni - Italian psychologist. Article "Maria Luisa Falorni" in Italian Wikipedia has 4.4 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 0 references and 4 sections.
Since the creation of article "Maria Luisa Falorni", its content was written by 5 registered users of Italian Wikipedia and edited by 5 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 7 times in Italian Wikipedia and cited 7 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Italian: #568093 08.2019 |
Global: #6896006 08.2019 |
| Best Rank | Italian: #133029 11.2022 |
Global: #2076443 11.2022 |
On 23 April 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: YouTube, Serie A, Shōgun, Fallout, Facebook, Fallout, Saint George, Saint George Day, Inter Milan, ChatGPT.
In Italian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Football Club Internazionale Milano, Lory Del Santo, Juventus Football Club, Antonia Brico, Albo d'oro del campionato italiano di calcio, Serie A, Baby Reindeer, Simone Inzaghi, Anniversario della liberazione d'Italia, Tre piani.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.53+0+0+17.39+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
